Explaining and defining reality only through science is like looking at the Pacific ocean through a hole in the wall and thinking what you see is what it is.
1 comment:
Nowhere Man
said...
Explaining and defining reality only through science is like looking at the Pacific ocean through a hole in the wall and thinking what you see is what it is.
Eh? That doesn't even make sense. What's your point again ? What has narrow field of vision of a hole in the wall got to do with 'science and reality' ? Your analogy presumes that a thing called 'pacific ocean' exists and the knowdlege of it being a 'very large body of water' is well known. Ergo the conclusion that what we see through the hole int he wall is 'limited' can be cocnluded. But no such assertion can be made about 'reality' or 'science' considering both are evanescent.
1 comment:
Explaining and defining reality only through science is like looking at the Pacific ocean through a hole in the wall and thinking what you see is what it is.
Eh? That doesn't even make sense. What's your point again ? What has narrow field of vision of a hole in the wall got to do with 'science and reality' ? Your analogy presumes that a thing called 'pacific ocean' exists and the knowdlege of it being a 'very large body of water' is well known. Ergo the conclusion that what we see through the hole int he wall is 'limited' can be cocnluded. But no such assertion can be made about 'reality' or 'science' considering both are evanescent.
Post a Comment